Living large by living small
Here's an interesting concept. Designer and architect Jay Schafer, self-proclaimed "claustrophile", wanted a house with a smaller environmental footprint, and ended up designing and building houses with a very small physical footprint, here shown is his own 100 square feet / 9 square meters home, the "EPU". As a bonus it is economical and easy to maintain too, how long can it take to sweep 9 square meters? It will definitely encourage neatness, otherwise the mess will probably immediately be out of control, and it will fight consumerism to some degree. You just can't bring much stuff home... :) And it's fast and cheap to heat or cool, depending on climate.
I think the philosophy of R. Buckminster Fuller, "Doing more with less", fits very well within this concept.
The inside of the EPU consists of kitchen, bathroom, sleeping room and the "great room". More interior views here.
But downsizing doesn't have to mean downscaling, it can actually be the opposite. Jay Shafer quotes the italian architect Carlo Scarpa:
"If you are making a corridor that is 20' wide, you can make it out of concrete; if it is 10' wide, you should use stone; if it is 6' wide, use fine wood; but if it is 2' wide, you should make it out of solid gold."
And if you're only going to have one doorhandle, as an example, why not get the nicest possible?
Some of the smaller houses of his, they range from 40 (!) square feet to a "whopping" 770 square feet (71 sq. meters), can be delivered built on a trailer. This serves two purposes. First, mobility. R. Buckminster Fuller designed his Dymaxion house with the feature of being (somewhat) easy to relocate, a trailer is of course even better. Tired of the view? Move the house to different spot on your property. Second, the trailer let's one circumvent local laws in the US that forbids (!) houses under a certain size. In Sweden on the other hand a house under 10 square meters, a.k.a "Friggebod" does not require a building permit. This maximum size will likely be upped to 15 sq. meters in the near future.
There are some obvious drawbacks with such a small house. Forget about raising a family! :) Collectors would have a hard time, unless the collections are small or consists of very small things. Having guests, especially staying over the night, will require some extra patience of both guests and host.
So, could I live in 100 sq. feet? Possibly, but only I was allowed to cheat with a shed three times the size for storage (do I really need all this stuff?), workshop and a washing machine.
I like his Z.Glass house design, with exterior walls of hot rolled steel that will get a natural rusty finish. Wicked!

More reading at www.tumbleweedhouses.com. All pictures from their site.
/O.K.
(Listening to while posting: MBMA - Musiken)
P.S. Post number 500!









