The downside with corporate positive thinking...
A great piece about why realism is better than overly positive thinking:
Welcome to this bilingual (Swedish-English) group blog by family members living on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, "the pond". Our interests range from the scientific to the eclectic, including gourmet food, horses, art and literature, computers, species in nature, history and iron, and photography. Three generations are posting here.
A great piece about why realism is better than overly positive thinking:
Posted by
LS
at
7:54 PM
1 comments
Labels: distraction, economy, fake, happiness, information, marketing, media, philosophy, politics, psychology, reality, USA, Youtube
" Everywhere I looked people were detached from everything around them. From the beautiful produce, the delightful pastries, the never-before-in-the-history-of-man selections of great wines and cheeses. The guys were not "checking out" the plethora of beautiful girls flowing like spring water thru the aisles. The women weren't even noticing the displays of chocolate. Instead, they did the "thorazine shuffle" with their carts aimlessly navigated with one hand and the rest of their being concentrated either on staring like zombies at the screens of their iPhones or Blackberries, or wandering without a compass while listening to something at the other end of their cell connection, eyes staring off into the middle distance. " [by Kirk Tuck]From this fantastic blogpost, read the rest of it, it is worth at least 5 minutes of your time. The blog is called Visual Science Lab and is written by Kirk Tuck. Lots of great thoughts there! (and thanks PP for sending the link to me)
Posted by
LS
at
11:00 PM
2
comments
Labels: communication, distraction, e-mail, stress, technology
Here are some thoughts I wrote down while flying on a plane recently just after reading about the last ever NASA shuttle mission taking off... (Update and clarification - the quoted text is what I wrote myself that day on a scrap of paper, so I am quoting myself.)
Posted by
LS
at
10:08 PM
1 comments
Labels: distraction, future, global warming, Government, internet, politics, ponderings, reality, space, TV, USA
We live in times where we can share more personal things with each other than ever before because of all online tools. We can tell the world what we like and dislike, favor and unfavor, and give thumbs up and thumbs down. We can rate movies, books, give mojo (= good) on comments on Daily Kos, and have thousands of favorites of photos on Flickr.
Some of us (not me) have many, many friends on Facebook, and maybe even more followers on Twitter. We send out messages via e-mail with links and attachments to great articles we find, funny cat pictures, and YouTube videos. We skype each other while doing other things, chopping up time and conversations into small, disjointed pieces. We get the same from others, click on links, laugh and send things on. We blog, put up pictures online, and hope to be found by whoever in the internet noise. I am all involved in this, and I think it is a great example of the me, me, me-culture that UTNE Reader highlighted a while back. It is all about us, or is it really?
Media, social and traditional, online and in print, and on FM radio are all part of this. It is not only chopped up time and factoids, and not only distraction and lack of attention, but really, the problem is bigger. People don't think and do not really communicate much anymore in a way that is really true to who they are. At least I believe so, because I do not think we all only care about Youtube videos, a LOLcat or something that just went viral. I think we care about more things, and have our own thoughts. The problem is that those own thoughtful thoughts are never really developed in this deluge of other stuff.
And isn't the problem here that for so many of these things, most of us don't really say what we think and feel about things anymore? It has become too easy to send and share your Likes, that nobody really know what it means to really LIKE and LOVE something, because that is never written down. When do people have time or take the effort to send long heartfelt e-mails or letters? When do people talk on the phone about deep things? When do we really share the real profound thoughts we might have, and if we do, how?
I think today's communication is rather shallow, except the ones we have with close friends. Most interaction and chatter online is rather meaningless, especially when all you do is to click Like/Dislike and Rating buttons. If you write a short review, then you tell people what you really think.... not when you give a book a 4 out of a 5. But who has time with things like that? So much easier just to click.
For all of you who have sent me videos, links, and photos, please keep sending them. I love it, and I don't mean to criticize you. I am just the same, I do all of these things. I just got thinking about this and wanted to share it with you, readers of this blog. And yes, there are some of you readers that send me wonderful, long letters, but I think you are a rarity. I like to write letters too, both by hand and on the computer. The problem is lack of time. At dinnertime we have the most wonderful in-depth and convoluted conversations here at home. But I see in society (American and Swedish) a tendency to become less and less personal, less focused on "who I am", and more about being one tiny fish going in the same direction as everybody else in the big general Gulf stream traffic on the internet.
(link to a great letter here)
The me-me-me-society is really not about ourselves, it is about trying to share something and be liked by many many people (who know very little about you) at once, so who dares to express something in a complete sentence with complete words that might be personal or honest? It could be used against you, in many different ways. Better to play it safe by just clicking on a Like button, right? But it that really fun? Is that really that important? Is that really liking something, for real? I think we should all be more real. For real.
PS. Of course this all applies to texting (SMS) too.
Posted by
LS
at
10:24 PM
1 comments
Labels: bad stuff, communication, distraction, e-mail, internet, media, news, society, Video, Web, Youtube
Posted by
LS
at
10:14 AM
0
comments
Labels: brain, distraction, education, focus, internet, technology
"People may doodle as a strategy to help themselves concentrate," said study co-author Jackie Andrade, a University of Plymouth psychologist. "We might not be aware that we’re doing it, but it could be a trick that people develop because it helps them from wandering off into a daydream." Read more here.
Posted by
LS
at
11:37 PM
0
comments
Labels: art, attention, brain, distraction, drawing, thinking
Who creates the new leaders and visionaries for our world?
Well, not today's schools, media, and institutions, argues William Deresiewicz in a great article named Solitude and Leadership recently published in the UTNE reader. I read it this morning, in the sofa with a cup of tea next to me, and there are so many things in it I agree with and would like to quote it. But I am afraid this post would be too long then, so it is better you just click on the link.
Take the time to read this article. Don't get distracted, just read it, it is important. I promise.
The center pieces of his thoughts are that:
Posted by
LS
at
9:48 AM
0
comments
Labels: brain, distraction, internet, leadership, literature, politics, society, thinking
When I grew up I remember seeing the movie Shangri-La on TV one Sunday afternoon, and I loved it. A hidden valley, far away in the Himalayas, a paradise away from everything else, isolated and self-sufficient. Last night PP showed me an old movie by Lewis Mumford called 'The City", which shows another kind of utopia - a village where workers live in nice houses without industrialization's horrors and pollution. It is worth watching, and you can find it here, in the Prelinger Archives of ephemeral films.
What struck me after seeing this movie is that there aren't any utopias anymore. We can't realistically dream about paradise islands where you can live away from the rest of the world. Everything is connected, affected, even if you want to be isolated. Every hidden valley, little town, or tropical island is affected by the global climate change, atmospheric pollution, radiation, and trash and toxins thrown into the sea, groundwater, or rivers. Over you satellites are watching you or give you connectivity to anywhere else in the world. All economies are linked, and what happens at Wall Street or in Asia's stock markets affect a country and village across the world.
So, the idea of Utopia has changed. Now we wish for small Utopian things, like affordable health care for all, toys without lead, and cleaner streets, while in the past you could dare to think big and dream away... I think this creates a kind of hopelessness and apathy in the new generations - it is much harder to change anything, the problems are big, global, and enormous. Even if you plan a small better village locally, you run into global and national problems and forces, since so much is controlled at a higher level, not locally anymore. Here in New Jersey, there used to be several local villages (like Roosevelt) built and based on Utopian ideas of fairness, sharing, and ethics. Now they are all just regular places like any other (with a few exceptions, like Free Acres).
Who even wishes for World Peace anymore? I do, but who really works for it? No big masses of people... I think the whole world view has changed since the hopeful 1960s, and gone downhill since then. The only way to change global things is for all of us to work together in all countries, and that seems pretty much impossible, sometimes even within just one country (US for example). Sad and depressing, unfortunately. Now the only real Utopias are new planets somewhere out there in the universe.
Maybe Utopia is just an impossibility, because humans are too selfish and competitive, and that all goes back to evolution and competition over scarce resources for survival? Still, I like the thought of better places for all...
Links for more information (to avoid the breaking up of your reading* I put these at the end)
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch: Where does the stuff go?
Utopia
Prelinger Archives: Lewis Mumford: "The City"
Shangri-La
Free Acres, New Jersey : Roosevelt, NJ
* Researchers have showed that reading online text with a lot of links in it breaks up the thought process and you get distracted and don't learn and think so much. At each hyperlink in the text your brain thinks "should I click on this or not", and you loose your thought and memories of what you just read. So even if you don't click on the link, you are affected, without knowing it. So, links at the end on this post. (Link to more about this here and here.)
Posted by
LS
at
9:26 AM
2
comments
Labels: astronomy, digital generation, distraction, global warming, history, movies, New Jersey, peace, politics, pollution, sustainability, teaching, technology, USA, war