Giant insects rescued at the brink of extinction, literally
[Photo by Granitethighs from Wikimedia, Creative Commons license. Thanks for letting us use it!]
Welcome to this bilingual (Swedish-English) group blog by family members living on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, "the pond". Our interests range from the scientific to the eclectic, including gourmet food, horses, art and literature, computers, species in nature, history and iron, and photography. Three generations are posting here.
Posted by LS at 9:18 PM 2 comments
Labels: Australia, exploration, insects, science, travel
(Long post but important)
Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it. Morals and ethics is all about this, making choices to do the right thing. Humans are not just following insticts, we can think, decide, do or not do. If you can steal something, should you? If you can make money on someone else's efforts without giving them anything, should you? If you can live without caring about others, should you? Pinterest and many of its users do.
OK, I had not heard about Pinterest until a few days ago, and looked it up and fell in love. Temporarily. Very temporarily. So, I had a 20 hour love affair with Pinterest, and now we are partly separated (not totally, read on). I know, this just happened AFTER I wrote that long thing about how we are too addicted to the internet, and I fell right into the addition to Pinterest trap.
Pinterest is a great way to collect links and thumbnails to all the interesting things you find on the web so you can find them again, or to make pinboards of images for inspiration, education, or useful things. It is exploding on the internet right now. So far so good, and that is what I loved about it. So much interesting stuff!!!
But then I clicked on an image to find out more and it linked back to Google Images, or I got a 404 error, or it linked me to Tumblr's home page, and something was obviously not right. Where did the image come from?
When I signed up for Pinterest I read the rules for the site, and it says that you have to have the right to pin anything made by you or that you have the copyright for, so you can't pin things copyrighted by others. But people do, 99% of people in Pinterest do, maybe more, and very few even give credit and source for each image. A typical pinned image is a photo of a gorgeous room with the note "I love this". No facts on where that image came from.
That can't be right, I thought, obviously this image wasn't taken by whatever house wife in Florida that pinned and loved it. Then I started googling "Pinterest copyright" and found a large set of recent articles about how Pinterest is avoiding by getting into trouble by making all its users, not themselves, legally liable for any copyright infringement. (Their own blog shows how upset some people are by this. Other info here, good post here, more, )
Pinterest takes no responsibility at all, and in fact, by using it you agree to give all the images you have pinned (and thereby downloaded to Pinterest as high-resolution photos, mostly illegally in my opinion) to Pinterest for free. Pinterest then have the right to sell these photos and make money of them, even if they are copyrighted by someone that had no idea that you pinned their gorgeous photo or art or craft idea, etc.
So, say that I pin my photos which are under Creative Commons license on Flickr to my board on Pinterest, and as soon as I have done that, I have no longer any control over them. Pinterest could sell them to Target to use in their advertising and I would get zero dollars, and I would not be asked for permission. This is so wrong!!!
Similarly, if a user pins an image of a new Porsche, Pinterest now has the right to use that image, even if it is copyrighted by Porsche. Simply put, Pinterest is fooling everybody, and stealing from everybody. And they let their users get away with it, and the users let Pinterest get away with it. Just like drug addiction... They need each other, the users and the company.
Pinterest's solution is that anybody that finds their copyrighted image pinned onto Pinterest by a user can contact them and have it removed from Pinterest's website. So it is up to the owner of the image to search the internet and complain. (This is unimaginable hard...) Imagine this happening with actual items. Someone comes into your house, robs you, and goes away with some of your stuff. Now you have to look for your things wide and far, and they are not marked with your name, address or anything. And if you find your things, then you have to fill out an online form and eventually you can get the stuff back. And in the end, the stealing doesn't get punished at all.
In fact, Pinterest doesn't care that its users pin lots of copyrighted things, and if there is a problem (say, they get sued by Modern Museum of Art for some art images a user has pinned), then the user will have to pay the legal bills for both herself AND for Pinterest's lawyers. It is all in the user agreement, and very clear. How can this be right? How can this be ethical? The user could be a company too, so if McDonalds pins a photo of a burger, they could get sued.... but Pinterest wouldn't. How crazy.
I love green things, both alive and very dead. But not mold. Molded green glass is OK though. (From the American Glass Museum in Wheaton, photo Vilseskogen on Flickr - more glass photos here)
More green things:
Green sushi for cowboys, kind of: picklelicious by The Good Wife (check out the photo)
Nathan Strandberg and Katie Kirk has some really nice green illustrations, except those that know me know that I don't eat celery... This is so retro 60s and 70s to me. I never thought I would like these shapes and colors again, after a giant overdose when I grew up, and now I do. Fads go in circles. Even orange and brown is back with a vengeance.
There are green book trees for your wall (from Shawn So in South Korea)
And I think I could live at Green Bridge Farm (if it wasn't in Georgia, USA, too hot!), but I like the idea of smaller houses with some privacy with a common vegetable farm and pond... pick your house here (pdf file).
And here is something partly green that I do not want in my house, even if it is crazy in a way.
And some very green chairs from a restaurant in Stockholm (photo Vilseskogen on Flickr).
Posted by LS at 8:43 PM 2 comments
Labels: architecture, art, bits and pieces, design, food, glass, house, photo, textiles, vegetables
”If you worship money and things — if they are where you tap real meaning in life — then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough. It’s the truth. Worship your own body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always feel ugly, and when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally plant you. On one level, we all know this stuff already — it’s been codified as myths, proverbs, clichés, bromides, epigrams, parables: the skeleton of every great story. The trick is keeping the truth up-front in daily consciousness. Worship power — you will feel weak and afraid, and you will need ever more power over others to keep the fear at bay. Worship your intellect, being seen as smart — you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out. And so on.
Look, the insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they’re evil or sinful; it is that they are unconscious. They are default-settings. They’re the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that’s what you’re doing. And the world will not discourage you from operating on your default-settings, because the world of men and money and power hums along quite nicely on the fuel of fear and contempt and frustration and craving and the worship of self.
Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom to be lords of our own tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the center of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talked about in the great outside world of winning and achieving and displaying.
The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day. That is real freedom. The alternative is unconsciousness, the default-setting, the ”rat race” — the constant gnawing sense of having had and lost some infinite thing."
Posted by LS at 9:15 PM 3 comments
This morning, for real. I love that the Swedish crown princess and her husband Daniel does it the modern way. Not that the first official photo of the princess, still unnamed, is on Facebook (it was, here), but that they do it like most Swedish families do, share the burden of carrying the newborn and I bet everything else too. Look at the photo and you will see. The video of the press conference is very moving too, where the new Dad is describing the little girl (sorry, it is in Swedish). Congratulations!
Update: And her name will be Estelle! And here is some more info about the event in English.
Posted by LS at 11:43 AM 0 comments
Labels: children, royalty, social media, Sweden
(This review is in Swedish, since the book is in Swedish and not yet translated to English. The book isn't worth reading in English anyway unless you want to read many, many beautifully crafted words about spoiled upper class Stockholm citizens. You can read about Louise Boije av Gennäs here. )
"En vilsekommen rufsig kråka lyfte från Mosebacke, fångade vinden i vingarna och lät sig hastigt föras bort mot Högalid där tvillingtornerns Alfa och Omega - alltings början och slut, döpta efter Ansgar och Olaus Petri - vakade över Tengboms mäktiga tegelmonument och staden från samma höjd över östersjon som Stadshusets Tre Kronor."
Posted by LS at 10:58 PM 0 comments
Labels: book review, literature, Stockholm, Sweden, Swedish
Pastel painting is very fun and exciting. Here is a painting I made from the archipelago outside Stockholm. It is a painting from the island Gillöga and shows Lommen's bod.
[LS comment: 'Bod' is the Swedish word for a small house or outbuilding, usually not made to live in but to store things in. A 'vedbod' is for storing firewood, for example]
Posted by AnS at 11:59 AM 2 comments
Labels: art, Baltic sea, handmade, nature, pastel, sea, Sweden
Some new studies are out, pointing out the troublesome backside of our connectedness online via e-mail, Facebook, Twitter and texting (SMS in Swedish). A new study concludes that the internet is more addictive than alcohol and nicotine, and I am starting to believe that (I don't have the link to the study yet, will post it when I find it). I have worried about this a long time, and have made a conscious decision not to be active on Facebook, not to have a twitter account, and try to keep the flow of information into and out of my head under my own control. But in today's world you can't do your job unless you are connected online, and without an e-mail account that you check everyday, your career and job availability would mostly be dead (well, maybe not if you are an artist living in New Hampshire, but I think you know what I mean... :).
I make it harder for me to be or get too addicted by not getting a smartphone, not having the laptop at the breakfast table, and consciously turning off e-mail and Skype during stretches of time at work, but the feeling is still there - "Oh, what is new? What is going on? Who needs me now? What cool things am I missing!?" I believe that this deluge of wanted and unwanted information plays straight into our psychological triggers in our brain. We get addicted, if we want it or not. And the more we use it, the more addicted we get.
Posted by LS at 12:59 PM 5 comments
Labels: behavior, brain, children, comics, computer games, computers, digital generation, e-mail, focus, gadgets, information, internet, parenting, psychology, teaching, technology, work
Posted by LS at 10:45 PM 0 comments
Labels: art, artists, color, crafts, New York City, philadelphia, sewing, textiles
So, you add bothersome things to your website so you are sure real people comment on our blog posts, and all of you that want to comment have to try to decipher strange letters and numbers to make a simple nice little comment. You hope that it at least will keep out the spam-bots that are just out there to put in hidden links for companies to get them a better Google rating. But oh no, in the last week, the spamming has started again. And, this time it is real people doing it. They are faking nice comments and at the end of the comment they include a url to a link for a commercial company (or even worse, it could be a website with a virus on it).
I really, really don't like this kind of spam terror. I don't care if there are poor people in some third-world country that get their living from this - it is plain time terrorism, and should be banned. If I see any comment like that, it is gone immediately from here. The text is often written in a way to make you think it is a real and positive comment, like this one, but when you start reading you realize that this is not what it is meant to be (I deleted the link to the commercial url):
"I would like to thank you for the efforts you've put in writing this website. I am hoping the same high-grade website post from you in the upcoming as well. Actually your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own website now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a great example of it."
Posted by LS at 9:14 PM 2 comments
Labels: blog, globalization, internet, spam
Posted by LS at 9:05 PM 3 comments
Posted by LS at 9:03 PM 0 comments
New design, clearly inspired by the design culture in the 1950´s in Sweden. Here the kitchen towel "Sill" by Marianne Nilsson. More towels and fabrics from Almedahls here. I like this fabric too, "I svampskogen" av David van Berckel.
Posted by EH at 3:31 PM 1 comments